SUSD2 suppresses CD8+ T cell antitumor immunity by targeting IL-2 receptor signaling

3 months ago 12

Data availability

ScRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data reported in this paper are accessible at the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession numbers GSE210704 and GSE212179, respectively. MS data have been deposited in an international public repository (MassIVE proteomics repository at https://massive.ucsd.edu/) under dataset accession number MSV000087205. There are no restrictions for data availability. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Schoenfeld, A. J. & Hellmann, M. D. Acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Cell 37, 443–455 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Altorki, N. K. et al. The lung microenvironment: an important regulator of tumour growth and metastasis. Nat. Rev. 19, 9–31 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Binnewies, M. et al. Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat. Med. 24, 541–550 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews, L. P., Yano, H. & Vignali, D. A. A. Inhibitory receptors and ligands beyond PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4: breakthroughs or backups. Nat. Immunol. 20, 1425–1434 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalbasi, A. & Ribas, A. Tumour-intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 25–39 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan, D. A., Ruscetti, F. W. & Gallo, R. Selective in vitro growth of T lymphocytes from normal human bone marrows. Science 193, 1007–1008 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pipkin, M. E. et al. Interleukin-2 and inflammation induce distinct transcriptional programs that promote the differentiation of effector cytolytic T cells. Immunity 32, 79–90 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalia, V. et al. Prolonged interleukin-2Rα expression on virus-specific CD8+ T cells favors terminal-effector differentiation in vivo. Immunity 32, 91–103 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyman, O. & Sprent, J. The role of interleukin-2 during homeostasis and activation of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 180–190 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leonard, W. J., Lin, J. X. & O’Shea, J. J. The γc family of cytokines: basic biology to therapeutic ramifications. Immunity 50, 832–850 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, X., Rickert, M. & Garcia, K. C. Structure of the quaternary complex of interleukin-2 with its α, β, and γc receptors. Science 310, 1159–1163 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rickert, M., Wang, X., Boulanger, M. J., Goriatcheva, N. & Garcia, K. C. The structure of interleukin-2 complexed with its α receptor. Science 308, 1477–1480 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyman, O., Kovar, M., Rubinstein, M. P., Surh, C. D. & Sprent, J. Selective stimulation of T cell subsets with antibody-cytokine immune complexes. Science 311, 1924–1927 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, M. A., Tyznik, A. J. & Bevan, M. J. Interleukin-2 signals during priming are required for secondary expansion of CD8+ memory T cells. Nature 441, 890–893 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bachmann, M. F., Wolint, P., Walton, S., Schwarz, K. & Oxenius, A. Differential role of IL-2R signaling for CD8+ T cell responses in acute and chronic viral infections. Eur. J. Immunol. 37, 1502–1512 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malek, T. R. The biology of interleukin-2. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26, 453–479 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scott, E. N., Gocher, A. M., Workman, C. J. & Vignali, D. A. A. Regulatory T cells: barriers of immune infiltration into the tumor microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 12, 702726 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sugahara, T. et al. Isolation of a novel mouse gene, mSVS-1/SUSD2, reversing tumorigenic phenotypes of cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Sci. 98, 900–908 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Souri, M., Kaetsu, H. & Ichinose, A. Sushi domains in the B subunit of factor XIII responsible for oligomer assembly. Biochemistry 47, 8656–8664 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Watson, A. P., Evans, R. L. & Egland, K. A. Multiple functions of sushi domain containing 2 (SUSD2) in breast tumorigenesis. Mol. Cancer Res. 11, 74–85 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan, W. et al. CSBF/C10orf99, a novel potential cytokine, inhibits colon cancer cell growth through inducing G1 arrest. Sci. Rep. 4, 6812 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cai, C. et al. Reduced expression of sushi domain containing 2 is associated with progression of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol. Lett. 10, 3619–3624 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sheets, J. N. et al. SUSD2 expression in high-grade serous ovarian cancer correlates with increased patient survival and defective mesothelial clearance. Oncogenesis 5, e264 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hultgren, E. M., Patrick, M. E., Evans, R. L., Stoos, C. T. & Egland, K. A. SUSD2 promotes tumor-associated macrophage recruitment by increasing levels of MCP-1 in breast cancer. PLoS ONE 12, e0177089 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, S. et al. Downregulation of endometrial mesenchymal marker SUSD2 causes cell senescence and cell death in endometrial carcinoma cells. PLoS ONE 12, e0183681 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Umeda, S. et al. Expression of sushi domain containing two reflects the malignant potential of gastric cancer. Cancer Med. 7, 5194–5204 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, X. et al. Myeloid-derived cullin 3 promotes STAT3 phosphorylation by inhibiting OGT expression and protects against intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 214, 1093–1109 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. McLane, L. M., Abdel-Hakeem, M. S. & Wherry, E. J. CD8 T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection and cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 37, 457–495 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller, B. C. et al. Subsets of exhausted CD8(+) T cells differentially mediate tumor control and respond to checkpoint blockade. Nat. Immunol. 20, 326–336 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, Z. et al. TCF-1-centered transcriptional network drives an effector versus exhausted CD8 T cell-fate decision. Immunity 51, 840–855 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hudson, W. H. et al. Proliferating transitory T cells with an effector-like transcriptional signature emerge from PD-1(+) stem-like CD8(+) T cells during chronic infection. Immunity 51, 1043–1058 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zander, R. et al. CD4(+) T cell help is required for the formation of a cytolytic CD8(+) T cell subset that protects against chronic infection and cancer. Immunity 51, 1028–1042 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin, H. et al. Host expression of PD-L1 determines efficacy of PD-L1 pathway blockade-mediated tumor regression. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 805–815 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wen, H., Dou, Y., Hogaboam, C. M. & Kunkel, S. L. Epigenetic regulation of dendritic cell-derived interleukin-12 facilitates immunosuppression after a severe innate immune response. Blood 111, 1797–1804 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mo, F. et al. An engineered IL-2 partial agonist promotes CD8(+) T cell stemness. Nature 597, 544–548 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Spolski, R., Li, P. & Leonard, W. J. Biology and regulation of IL-2: from molecular mechanisms to human therapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 648–659 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Krieg, C., Letourneau, S., Pantaleo, G. & Boyman, O. Improved IL-2 immunotherapy by selective stimulation of IL-2 receptors on lymphocytes and endothelial cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11906–11911 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Spangler, J. B. et al. Antibodies to interleukin-2 elicit selective T cell subset potentiation through distinct conformational mechanisms. Immunity 42, 815–825 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen, J. et al. NR4A transcription factors limit CAR T cell function in solid tumours. Nature 567, 530–534 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ye, L. et al. A genome-scale gain-of-function CRISPR screen in CD8 T cells identifies proline metabolism as a means to enhance CAR-T therapy. Cell Metab. 34, 595–614 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lotze, M. T. et al. High-dose recombinant interleukin 2 in the treatment of patients with disseminated cancer. Responses, treatment-related morbidity, and histologic findings. JAMA 256, 3117–3124 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dudley, M. E. et al. Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science 298, 850–854 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hashimoto, M. et al. CD8 T cell exhaustion in chronic infection and cancer: opportunities for interventions. Annu Rev. Med. 69, 301–318 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Beltra, J. C. et al. Developmental relationships of four exhausted CD8(+) T cell subsets reveals underlying transcriptional and epigenetic landscape control mechanisms. Immunity 52, 825–841 e828 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. West, E. E. et al. PD-L1 blockade synergizes with IL-2 therapy in reinvigorating exhausted T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 2604–2615 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Wen, H., Lei, Y., Eun, S. Y. & Ting, J. P. Plexin-A4-semaphorin 3A signaling is required for Toll-like receptor- and sepsis-induced cytokine storm. J. Exp. Med. 207, 2943–2957 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kwon, H. et al. Androgen conspires with the CD8(+) T cell exhaustion program and contributes to sex bias in cancer. Sci. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.abq2630 (2022).

  48. Van Gassen, S. et al. FlowSOM: using self-organizing maps for visualization and interpretation of cytometry data. Cytom. A 87, 636–645 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zilionis, R. et al. Single-cell barcoding and sequencing using droplet microfluidics. Nat. Protoc. 12, 44–73 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zuo, D. et al. PlasmID: a centralized repository for plasmid clone information and distribution. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D680–D684 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lin, Y. H. et al. Self-assembled STrap for global proteomics and salivary biomarker discovery. J. Proteome Res. 18, 1907–1915 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tyanova, S., Temu, T. & Cox, J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 11, 2301–2319 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kochenderfer, J. N., Yu, Z., Frasheri, D., Restifo, N. P. & Rosenberg, S. A. Adoptive transfer of syngeneic T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor that recognizes murine CD19 can eradicate lymphoma and normal B cells. Blood 116, 3875–3886 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Wen laboratory for discussion; Y. Wan for critical feedback; M. Croft for the OT-II mice; Y. Fu for the MC38 cell line; Y. Yu from the University of Delaware Mass Spectrometry Core Facility for the assistance of mass spectrometry assay; P. Yan and X. Chen from the Genomics Shared Resource at the Ohio State University for the assistance of bulk RNA-seq and scRNA-seq assay. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01GM135234 and R01AI162779 (H.W.), R01AI077283 and R01CA262089 (Z.L.), R01GM131399 (Q.M.), R01DE026728 (Y.L.), R01AI134972 (K.J.O.) and The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Intramural Research Program (A.M., D.M.J., K.H. and H.W.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, Infectious Disease Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Bao Zhao, Weipeng Gong, Jianwen Chen, Hong Dong, Zihao Liu, Devin M. Jones, Kenneth J. Oestreich, Gang Xin & Haitao Wen

  2. Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Bao Zhao, Maria Velegraki, Lingling Wang, Tamio Okimoto, Meixiao Long, Qin Ma, Gang Xin, David P. Carbone, Kai He, Zihai Li & Haitao Wen

  3. Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Anjun Ma & Qin Ma

  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Lingling Wang & Meixiao Long

  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Tamio Okimoto, David P. Carbone & Kai He

  6. Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Yu L. Lei

Contributions

H.W. designed the experiments, supervised the study and interpreted the data. B.Z., W.G., J.C., M.V., H.D., Z.L., T.O. and D.M.J. performed experiments and provided intellectual input. A.M. and Q.M. performed key scRNA-seq analysis and provided intellectual input. L.W. and M.L. performed CAR T cell experiment and provided intellectual input. Y.L.L., K.J.O., G.X., D.P.C., K.H. and Z.L. contributed intellectual input and generated critical reagents. H.W. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haitao Wen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Immunology thanks Ping-Chih Ho and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Ioana Visan, in collaboration with the Nature Immunology team. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Susd2−/− mice show no change in global immune cell populations at steady state.

a, Cartoon of the strategy to generate Susd2−/− mice with a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering strategy. The sequences of two guide RNA and the primers used for genotyping were shown. b, Genotyping results for WT or Susd2−/− alleles. c-j, Flow cytometry analysis of T cells (CD3+) and natural killer cells (NK1.1+) (c), CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (d), regulatory T cells in naïve status (CD4+CD25+) (f), macrophage (CD11b+F4/80+) (g), conventional dendritic cells (CD11b+CD11c+) (h), monocytes (CD11b+Ly6C+) (i), neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+) (j), and histogram of B cells (CD19+) (e) in spleen from wild-type and Susd2−/− mice were. c-j, WT, n = 4 mice, Susd2−/−, n = 5 mice. b-j, data are representative of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test, there is no significant difference between WT and Susd2−/− in c-j (P > 0.05). All data are mean ± SD.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Susd2 deficiency does not affect intratumoral myeloid cells, NK cells and CD4+ T cells.

a-g, Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages (a), CD11b+CD11c+ dendritic cells (b), CD11b+Ly6C+ monocytes (c), CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils (d), NK1.1+ NK cells (e), IFN-γ+NK1.1+ NK cells (f), IFN-γ+CD4+, GzmB+CD4+ and TNF+CD4+ T cells (g) in MC38 tumor isolated from WT or Susd2−/− mice at Day 18. h,i, Spectral flow cytometry analysis of intratumor CD8+ T cells from WT and Susd2−/− mice at day18 post MC38 tumor inoculation. UMAP of individual marker expression patterns (h) and frequencies of individual clusters of WT and Susd2−/− samples (i), Boxes represent median and 25th to 75th percentiles, whiskers are minimum to maximum values excluding outliers (two-sided Wilcoxon’s rank-sum P value). j-l, Flow cytometry analysis of PD-1+CD8+ T cells and LAG-3+CD8+ T cells in MC38 (j), EG7 (k) or B16-OVA (l) tumors isolated from WT or Susd2−/− mice at day 18 post tumor inoculation. a–d,g,j-l, n = 5, e,f,i, n = 8. n, number of mice per group. a–d,g,j,k,l, data are representative of three independent experiments, e,f,i, data are representative of two independent experiments. a-g, j-l, statistical significance was determined by two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test, there is no significant difference between WT and Susd2−/− group (P > 0.05). All data are mean ± SD.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Susd2−/− CD8+ cells exhibit increased antitumor effector function.

a, Flow cytometry analysis of IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells, GzmB+CD8+ T cells and TNF+CD8+ T cells in different OVA257–264 dosage stimulated splenocytes isolated from WT or Susd2−/− OT-I mice. b-e, CD8+ T cells were isolated from total splenocytes of either WT or Susd2−/− OT-I mice left untreated or stimulated with OVA257–264 for 3 days and were subjected to RNA-seq assay. The volcano plot of RNA-seq data demonstrates differential gene expression between WT and Susd2/ CD8+ T cells at Day 0 (b) and Day 3 (d). A heat map of the top thirty genes representing genes differentially expressed between WT and Susd2/ CD8+ T cells at Day 0 (c) and Day 3 (e). f, Intracellular accumulation of IFN-γ in CD8+ T cells isolated from WT or Susd2−/− OT-I mice that were co-cultured with either WT or Susd2−/− bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) that have been pulsed with OVA257–264. a,f, n = 3, b-e, n = 4. n, number of mice per group. a,f, data are representative of four independent experiments. b-e, data are representative of two independent experiments. b,d statistical significance was calculated using two-sided Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test and adjusted with Bonferroni’s correction. Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test(a,f) with P values noted in the figure. All data are mean ± SD.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Susd2 deficiency does not affect effector function of CD4+ T cells or inhibitory function of Treg cells.

a, Flow cytometry analysis of IFN-γ+CD4+ T cells, GzmB+CD4+ T cells and TNF+CD4+ T cells in OVA323–339 stimulated splenocytes isolated from WT or Susd2−/− OT-II mice. b, Flow cytometry analysis of intranuclear level of Foxp3 in spleen CD4+ T cells from WT or Susd2−/− mice. c, Cell proliferation of naïve CD4+ T cells upon stimulation with CD3-CD28 antibody in the absence or presence of WT or Susd2−/− Treg cells at the indicated cell: cell ratio was measured by the staining of carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE), followed by FACS analysis. ac, n = 3. n, number of mice per group. Data are representative of four independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test, there is no significant difference between WT and Susd2−/− group in ac (P > 0.05). All data are mean ± SD.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 The authenticity of the IL-2Rα molecular weight.

a, Sanger sequencing result of pCMV3×Flag-IL2RA vector. b, Immunoblotting of Flag-IL2Rα in 293 T cells transfected with pCMV3×Flag-IL2RA vector. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Efficient control of tumor growth by IL-2/mAbCD25 complex in Susd2−/− mice.

a, Transcript of Susd2 in mouse CD8+ T cells stimulated with CD3-CD28 antibody, IL-2, IL-7 or IL-15 for 0, 1, 2 and 3 days. b-d, Immunoblotting of STAT5 in OVA257–264-primed WT or Susd2−/− OT-I T cells which were rested overnight, and then stimulated with IL-2 (100 U/ml), IL-7 (5 ng/ml) or IL-15 (10 ng/ml) for 0, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes. e, Flow cytometry analysis of p-STAT5 in WT or Susd2−/− Treg cells stimulated with IL-2 (100 U/ml) for 0, 30, 60 and 120 minutes. f, CD8+ T cells isolated from WT or Susd2−/− OT-I mice were co-cultured with WT or Susd2−/− bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) that have been pulsed with OVA257–264. Intracellular accumulation of IFN-γ in WT or Susd2−/− CD8+ T cells in the absence or presence of blocking antibodies against IL-2, IL-2Rα, or IL-2Rβ were measured by FACS analysis. g,h, Tumor growth in WT and Susd2−/− mice bearing B16-F10 tumor cells which were injected with IL-2/AbCD25 complex (g) or IL-2/AbCD122 complex(h). i-k, Flow cytometry analysis of intracellular accumulation of IFN-γ, GzmB and TNF-expressing intratumoral CD8+ T cells. a,e,f, n = 3; g-k, n = 5. n, number of mice per group. a-h, data are representative of three independent experiments; i-k, data are representative of two independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (e-g) or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (a,i-k) with P values noted in the figure. All data are mean ± SD.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Identification of EL4-hCD19 cells and CAR T cells.

a, Validation of EL4 thymoma cell line expressing human CD19 (EL4-hCD19) with the deletion of its intracellular domain. b, Percentages of CD8+ T cells retrovirally transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) containing a portion of hCD19 single chain variable fragment (ScFv) fused with signaling domains of mouse CD28 and mouse CD3ζ sequence (with first and third ITAMs of the CD3ζ molecule inactivated) before and after cell sorting were assessed by the staining with anti-Thy1.1 antibody. c, Transcript of Susd2 in CAR T cells that have been electroporated with scrambled gRNA(sgRNA) or Susd2 gRNA-Cas9 nucleoprotein (RNP) complex, sgRNA versus Susd2 gRNA (P = 0.0010). c, n = 3. a–c, data are representative of two independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test (c) with P values noted in the figure. The data represent mean ± SD.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 A model for an inhibitory role of SUSD2 in effector CD8+ T cell antitumor immunity by modulating IL-2R signaling.

The present study has identified SUSD2 as a negative regulator of IL-2-mediated effector CD8+ T cell functions and antitumor immunity. Both SUSD2 and IL-2Rα chain (IL-2Rα) contain the sushi domain (SD). Genetic ablation of SUSD2 (Susd2−/−) leads to elevated IFN-γ, GzmB and TNF production in effector CD8+ T cells and improved tumor growth control in multiple syngeneic tumor models. Mechanistically, SD-dependent interaction between SUSD2 and IL-2Rα competitively inhibits IL-2-IL-2Rα binding, leading to an attenuated IL-2R signaling. Therefore, SUSD2 represents a promising therapeutic target of tumor immunotherapy. Green and red arrows indicate promoting and inhibiting effect, respectively.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Tables 1–8

Supplementary Table 1. Marker transcripts of the 18 single-cell clusters. Supplementary Table 2 Marker transcripts of the four CD8+ T cell clusters. Supplementary Table 3 DEGs between WT and Susd2 KO at Day 0. Supplementary Table 4 DEGs between WT and Susd2 KO at day 3. Supplementary Table 5 The list of Susd2-interacting proteins detected by anti-V5 immunoprecipitates coupled with MS analysis. Supplementary Table 6 Primer sequences for molecular cloning. Supplementary Table 7 Primer sequences for site-directed mutagenesis. Supplementary Table 8 Primer sequences for RT–PCR

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, B., Gong, W., Ma, A. et al. SUSD2 suppresses CD8+ T cell antitumor immunity by targeting IL-2 receptor signaling. Nat Immunol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-022-01326-8

Download citation

  • Received: 02 December 2021

  • Accepted: 08 September 2022

  • Published: 20 October 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-022-01326-8

Read Entire Article
Анализ сайта rss.skrepka.top Анализ сайта Анализ сайта page rank checker Счетчик ИКС Наш сайт в каталоге manyweb.ru доска объявлений Поиск в RSS новостях и блогах Сервер радиолюбителей России - схемы, документация,
 соревнования, дипломы, программы, форумы и многое другое! Каталог сайтов на http://www.delo.net.ua/ DMCA.com Protection Status